Ketan Agarwal Murder: ₹10 Crore Defamation Notice Sent to Siya Goyal’s Brother
Indiadailyupdate.com – The recent developments in the Ketan Agarwal murder case have intensified legal drama as his advocate, Aashutosh Srivastava, filed a ₹10 crore defamation notice against Sahil Goyal, Siya Goyal’s brother. The notice accuses Sahil of spreading false information that has damaged the reputation of Srivastava’s client, potentially influencing public opinion and judicial proceedings. This move comes after a heated clash during a court hearing where Siya and her boyfriend, both implicated in the case, were brought before Vadgaon Maval magistrate, sparking debates over their involvement and the legal strategies being employed.
Legal Dispute Over Representation and Statements
During the court session, a pivotal moment arose when Srivastava presented a ‘vakalatnama’ (power of attorney) signed by Siya, which allegedly authorized his legal team to represent her in the case. However, Siya contested this, insisting that her appointed lawyer was Vipul Dushing, a member of her family. Sahil Goyal’s team argued that they had not been consulted about the document and accused Srivastava of using deceptive tactics to secure the signature. The dispute highlights the tension between the two legal representatives and raises questions about the authenticity of Siya’s involvement.
“Srivastava never approached us or was authorized to represent Siya,” Sahil claimed. “He obtained her signature through deceit and even threatened our family.”
Srivastava defended his actions, asserting that he had directly communicated with Siya, who voluntarily agreed to his representation. He emphasized Siya’s maturity, stating she was capable of making independent decisions regarding her legal affairs. The advocate also dismissed Sahil’s allegations as “incorrect,” noting that the notice was a direct response to statements made by Sahil’s team during the hearing. This back-and-forth underscores the complexity of the case and the emotional stakes involved.
Policing the Crime Scene and Family Statements
Meanwhile, the police have taken steps to reconstruct the crime scene, using a human-sized dummy to simulate the events leading to Ketan Agarwal’s death. Siya was reportedly present at the fort during this exercise, where she allegedly signaled Chaudhary to push the victim off the cliff. Officials confirmed that Chaudhary returned to Pune on the same scooter after the incident, adding to the narrative of coordinated actions. This reconstruction has drawn public scrutiny, with some viewing it as a critical piece of evidence in the investigation.
Siya’s parents and brother have also been extensively questioned by authorities, with their statements recorded as part of the broader inquiry. The family’s accounts, though not yet fully disclosed, are believed to be central to understanding the sequence of events and the motivations behind the alleged crime. Legal experts suggest that these testimonies could play a key role in determining the culpability of the accused and shaping the court’s perspective on the case.
The defamation notice, which amounts to ₹10 crore, is significant not only for its financial weight but also for its symbolic impact on the case. Srivastava’s decision to pursue this legal action reflects the high stakes involved, as the case continues to capture national attention. With Siya and her boyfriend at the center of the controversy, the notice may also serve as a strategic move to counter negative publicity and assert control over the narrative. As the legal battle progresses, the focus remains on the key players and the evidence that will ultimately decide their fate in the Ketan Agarwal murder case.
